Monday, 23 March 2015

Please go and talk to the other guy . . .


0cbaab58-339e-11e4-a4e0-22000ab926d3-large.jpg
 . . . and stop wasting my time.  Many thanks!  Regards, @DanRJohnson

O.K. - So I habitually use this graphic as a 'sanity control' (!) - but why do people seek to maintain that access to skilled, experienced, expert legal advice and assistance should be free?   

Thursday, 19 March 2015

Equitable Law Advises and Assists with the English Law Aspects of the Sale of a Drug Product


Equitable Law is pleased to announce (within the restrictions of confidentiality to which we are subject) that we have recently provided legal advice and assistance in relation to English Law aspects which were relevant to the sale and purchase of an early-stage drug product.

The product has historically been developed (and is currently owned) by an unidentified publicly traded company based in an English speaking common law jurisdiction, and a conditional disposal has now been agreed with another public company in a separate English speaking common law jurisdiction.

The aggregate consideration for the transaction was a local currency equivalent of a significant eight figure United States Dollar amount (USD $ XX,000,000).

Considerable English law (and practical business) elements arose in relation to the transaction, because the relevant product has historically been developed through an English limited liability company - which (latterly) has exploited the United Kingdom's ‘patent box legislation’ – which potentially creates a significantly advantageous tax position for the future development and exploitation of intellectual property which is subject to the United Kingdom’s taxation system.

The relevant conditionally agreed sale is now awaiting approvals from various regulatory bodies on a worldwide basis, and further details may be announced once the specific details of this transaction becomes publicly announced.
Friday, 20th March 2015
For further details (within restrictions of confidentiality)
Please contact:

Dan.Johnson@EquitableLaw.com

+1 (646) 470 1880 (Worldwide Roaming e-Tel.)

Tuesday, 3 February 2015

Selecting Your Legal Advisor When Selling Your Business

The following article was written by Equitable Law's principal (Mr. Dan Johnson) for Evolution Capital and published in its February 2015 email newsletter - 'The Evolutionist'

http://www.evolutioncapital.com/news-articles/selecting-your-legal-advisor-when-selling-your-business#.VNDnpS5sSox


Legal Article – ‘The Evolutionist’

”SELECTING YOUR LEGAL ADVISOR WHEN SELLING YOUR BUSINESS”
The Thoughts Of A Poacher Turned (Occasional) Gamekeeper
Dan Johnson – Legal Advisor – Evolution Capital

So a decision has been made that you wish to sell your business, and discussions have commenced regarding the process.  At some point you will need to think about what will be necessary in terms of legal advice and assistance.

The following reflects my musings (as a lawyer active in this area of business, for in excess of twenty years) as to how I would recommend you approach the process.

Number One – Don't Leave The Selection Of Your Lawyer Until The Last Minute

There is a natural tendency to consider that lawyers are expensive, and the longer you can put off involving them, the cheaper it will be.   You have to balance that approach with ensuring that you don't disadvantage yourself by placing the lawyer you belatedly instruct in a rushed position, and with limited background information. 

After all, military chiefs rarely raise their fighting forces the day before their battles – and if they did, they should hardly be surprised if those forces performed in an unsatisfactory manner.

The huge advantage which Evolution Capital has brought to the market is that (as a closely integrated part of its services), it offers a highly relevant legal advice and assistance service to its clients from the start of the process, operating in close liaison with the rest of its services.   These services need not be hugely time consuming - nor expensive, but it allows for early legal input designed to ensure that your proposed transaction proceeds in a smooth manner, which stands the best chance of success. 

The last position in which you wish to find yourself is to have progressed through agreeing outline heads of terms, to then belatedly present them to your chosen lawyer who recognises that there are potential significant legal issues with the deal being proposed, or finds that you have agreed in principle to a significant weakening of your legal position (often without fully realising what it is that you have conceded).

Number Two – Don't Buy Solely On Price

Despite what many may believe, the legal market in the United Kingdom is extremely competitive, and by bargaining hard with multiple service providers you may well be able to get a very competitive fee estimate for the legal advice and assistance which is likely to be involved in selling your business. 

However, what you should seek to avoid is experiencing the position which seems to have arisen in the U.K.'s property conveyancing market, where clients tend to buy their conveyancing services based largely upon the lowest price which they are able to obtain from enquiring of a range of legal services providers.  The highly competitive nature of that market leads to the widely perceived dissatisfaction with the legal process involved in conveyancing, as many lawyers simply do not have the time to adequately deal with the necessary work - for the fees they have agreed.  Conveyancing customers should not be surprised if having payed budget prices they get a budget service – and the same may well apply to you if you also take that approach. 

Remember that when you come to sell your business, you are likely to be dealing with a significant proportion of your wealth, pursuant to an agreement which is likely to oblige you to face the risk of potentially repaying some, or the entire purchase price to the buyer after the transaction.  Surely, that makes it worth focussing upon instructing someone who can really help with the process in a highly competent fashion (without price being paramount).

However, you should clearly ascertain how much a process might cost, and you should aim to mitigate costs for an abortive transaction – but a fair price for good quality work should be your aim.  Evolution Capital aims for its integrated legal services to be competitive and clearly priced (while providing full quality).    

Number Three – Don't Necessarily Choose Your Habitual Advisor

Lawyers and how they practice law is similar to how doctors practice medicine, in that while all doctors have a common training on the core elements which underlies their profession, relatively soon into their professional life, they tend to focus upon areas of medicine in which they have started to gather experience (and hopefully expertise). 

In exactly the same way that you would not expect to receive expert advice upon a heart problem from a cancer specialist, going to a legal adviser who has recently helped you with (say) an employment law claim against your business (however adequately) – is not necessarily going to be appropriate in terms of obtaining assistance with the legal aspects of the sale of your business. 

I know that certain of my colleagues have views as to the frustrations of dealing with lawyers selected to undertake a business sale, when the business owner has selected them by virtue of the fact that those lawyers have advised the business owner in relation to all his personal asset and family matters over many years (or they know them from the golf club etc.).

I will choose to say nothing more, other than to say – do choose a lawyer with the necessary experience and expertise in what is involved in a business sale process – It’s in your best interests! 

Evolution Capital would be delighted to assist by offering its relevant integrated legal services.    

Number Four - Don't Blindly Choose A ‘Top’ Firm

Every commercial centre in the U.K. has a list of ‘top’ firms in their locale.  However, when you review that list, what you are considering are the largest firms, or (viewed from another perspective), the firms which have been the most successful in extracting more fees from more clients. 

Despite all their marketing efforts to persuade you as to their merits, large firms do not necessarily provide a great legal service to all of their clients across all aspects of legal advice – and they are certainly not likely to be considered inexpensive. 

If you want an analogy, some of you may have experience of having a luxury car brand model serviced.  That experience may be of it being extremely costly, with the nagging reflection that you’ve just paid a large sum for a lot of relatively inexperienced (but well paid) people, to blindly follow a computer–diagnostic machine’s advice.   Conversely, you may have discovered much more satisfaction from economic servicing from an experienced mechanic who really understands what is likely to be the issue with the car (as explained to him).

‘Top’ firms know the market and their business very well, from persuasive marketing through to ensuring work is done by relatively inexperienced staff at relatively high fee rates!  While it might be cynical to say that ‘the marble and the mahogany’ is for the benefit of the lawyers, if it is your money that is being spent - think hard about whether you feel you are going to receive a great service at an economic price from such service providers. 

You may have a deep psychological need to consider yourself a client of a ‘top’ firm (I’ve seen it recently), but we can recommend appropriate professionals for you if that is the case!  

Evolution Capital aims to be able to provide you with ‘top’ legal advice, but without the ‘top’ firm costings.

Number Five – Do Choose A Personal Recommendation

If at all possible, I would strongly encourage you to seek a personal recommendation (from a person you trust) as to an appropriate person to provide the necessary legal services for you. 

My view is that legal services are and should be chosen by reference to the individuals likely to be involved – both in the transaction itself, and who are going to be available afterwards. 

I am always surprised to find myself talking to contacts who say that they have recently been dealing with such-and-such a firm - but when I ask who they have been dealing with, they are unable to provide me a name!  I often question whether they have been delegated to such a junior lawyer, that they are embarrassed to tell me – but the reality is that the process has become so impersonal – that the contact did not care which individual was undertaking their work!  I am generally (in such situations) advising clients as to what it is they have agreed to – which is a position I would encourage you to avoid!      

Several years ago a businessman said to me that over the course of their career, they had been obliged to use various legal services providers, some of whom were boutique firms - who had but a small cadre of individuals involved, and some of whom were large firms - with many times that number of personnel.  It was that businessman’s perception that within the respective numbers of personnel in each business, there were about the same proportion of individuals who that businessman would welcome working with again (because they were good at what they did and the businessman liked working with them etc.) - and those who failed that test on one or more grounds.  However, the businessman remarked - within the smaller business he tended to know the identities of the individuals who fell into each respective class.  In the larger business, it was more of a ‘lucky dip’ (even for those inside the larger business)!

Evolution Capital's huge advantage is that it already offers a personal recommendation for legal advice ‘in house’, based upon its prior experience of working with its chosen lawyers.

Conclusion

I hope the above has assisted you think about some aspects of how you might select your legal adviser for your future transactions. 

I would be delighted to continue any conversations with regard to my thoughts on these issues. 

In my next article, I intend to muse upon some of the alternative approaches to undertaking a legal transaction that would involve a potential sale of your business.

Monday, 20th October 2014

Legal Advisor

U.K. Cellular Tel.   +44 (0) 7788 537 187

The Private Office | 24 Bemish Road London | SW15 1DG
e-Tel. +1 (646) 470 1880 | e-Fax. +44 (0) 871 264 9515

Tuesday, 6 January 2015

Wikimedia Donation for Festive Season 2014 & 'Happy New Year' 2015 !



As is Equitable Law's usual practice, we did not send greeting cards during the December 2014 festive season.

Instead Equitable Law made a donation to our chosen public interest organisation – which for 2014 was : https://www.wikimedia.org .
 
Wikimedia is a global movement whose mission is to bring free educational content to the world.  Through various projects, chapters, and the support structure of the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, Wikimedia strives to bring about a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.  

Equitable Law encourages you to investigate the work of Wikimedia and to likewise support its valuable work for humanity.

We take this opportunity to wish you 'Happy New Year' - With our best wishes for your 2015.

Thursday, 6 November 2014

Luxembourg Tax = Disgraceful!

The Guardian's special investigation into Luxembourg's tax arrangements with multinationals is staggering.

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/nov/05/-sp-luxembourg-tax-files-tax-avoidance-industrial-scale

However, for anyone who professionally advises in the field of tax driven corporate structures it will not come as any surprise.

Now this is becoming more open - governments need to 'get to grips' with it. 

Broadly - from a corporate law perspective under English law, any director who does not utilise these (admittedly - arguably legal) structures to save their company's tax - is in breach of their duties (however 'morally ambiguous' that may be).

The tax distortions it creates are hugely damaging to society in that (for example) physical 'bricks and mortar' retailers on British high streets pay relatively huge amounts of tax and are driven out of business, while e-tailers pay next to no tax.

The competition is unfair, and while I am totally in agreement with competitive tax rates between states - the practices referred to are simply abuse. 

With most of the world's developed economies running (generally large) budget deficits you would have thought that the politicians and their civil servants would be interested in sorting this situation out - It surely cannot be unpopular with the electorate (but I fear that I am ascribing a level of competence to them - which may be causing you to laugh long & hard?!)

Discuss? / Offline / Sometime!

Dan.Johnson@EquitableLaw.com

+44 (0) 7788 537 187 (U.K. Cellular Tel.)

Friday, 26 September 2014

Equitable Law's Model Articles of Association and Subscription & Shareholders Agreement Available for Use

We are delighted to announce that Equitable Law's template model 'Articles of Association' and 'Subscription and Shareholders Agreement' for British companies have now been fully prepared for use with our clients. 

Any limited liability company which has a shareholding structure involving  joint ownership (of any description) needs to put in place these documents - so as to deal with the unavoidable uncertainties of future circumstances in the development of the relevant company's affairs.

Reproduced below are the front pages and contents tables - giving (we trust) an indication of the documents' contents.  While these are fully comprehensive documents (containing a large number of detailed provisions), we believe these documents can be adapted for every conceivable joint ownership structure, from a quasi-partnership individuals' venture, through to management buy-out and substantial parties' joint-venture arrangements.  






 
Please contact us if you would like to discuss using these documents in such circumstances as are relevant to you.

Regards

Dan.Johnson@EquitableLaw.com

+44 (0) 7788 537 187 (U.K. Cellular Telephone)   

Tuesday, 23 September 2014

'Entrepreneur Handbook' Caps A Busy Summer of Investments - Advised and Assisted by Equitable Law's Dan Johnson

The Summer of  2014 was extremely busy for Equitable Law in terms of legally advising and assisting in relation to share based investments in United Kingdom (and international) based ventures.  It seems that in a continuing era of low interest rates upon cash deposits and a lack of bank provided debt finance - 'business angel equity investors' continue to seek to 'fill the funding gap'.   

The nature of our client base means that many of the relevant investments are highly confidential and / or commercially sensitive, such that although we would dearly like to tell you much more about the investment transactions that we have recently assisted with - such as those involving a high profile sports personality investing in one of the businesses that services them, and the cutting-edge British based technology venture which received investment from a significant mainland-Europe based engineering group - our lips are sealed!

However, the most prominent of our Summer 2014 investment transactions was the second round of share based investment into 'Entrepreneur Handbook' (www.entrepreneurhandbook.co.uk), a web based publisher creating articles, guides, resources and more to help aspiring entrepreneurs get to the next level of the development of their ventures.

Following Entrepreneur Handbook's seed round investment by West of England based Marmaduke Holdings in 2013 (upon which we also advised), we advised Entrepreneur Handbook in taking a confidential / undisclosed amount 'A Series' round of share based investment from the China based Shanghai Zhezhou Industry Co. Limited - best known for its 'Uno Ventures' operations (www.unostartups.com).

Pinsent Masons' Glasgow (and Shanghai) offices advised Uno Ventures.

Equitable Law (Dan Johnson) advised 'Entrepreneur Handbook' and its founder, Mr. David Friel and commented : 'We were delighted to be again engaged by 'Entrepreneur Handbook' to assist with their equity funding arrangements.  As one of the most prominent ventures associated with this area of the U.K. early stage business corporate finance scene this further invitation made us extremely proud'.

Mr. Friel commented : 'It is always a pleasure to take sensible commercial legal advice and assistance from Dan - and we are delighted by the smooth completion of this transaction which allows Entrepreneur Handbook access to the massive Chinese market through the connections of our new investor.'