Tuesday 27 May 2014

Equitable Law Advises & Assists With The Purchase Of A Commercial Cleaning Business Saving Over 1000 Jobs


Equitable law recently assisted a buyer of a business (and related assets) of UK commercial cleaning company, Jani-King (GB) Limited, which had entered administration on 12th March 2014.

Jani-King (GB) Limited operated a commercial contract cleaning service to high profile hotel chains, restaurants and retail outlets across the UK.

Equitable Law assisted our client buyer with ensuring that the hotel cleaning focused elements of the business were successfully purchased, so as to be traded after the administration.

The administrators were legally advised and assisted by Squire Sanders' London office.

As is frequently the case with pre-packaged administration sale and purchase transactions, the necessary legal advice and assistance was required to be intensively undertaken in a very short time-scale - which Equitable Law was delighted to successfully achieve.

Further details are confidential, but the administrators (of Moorfields Corporate Recovery) made an announcement, available at :-

http://www.moorfieldscr.com/news/moorfields-complete-sale-commercial-cleaning-business-saving-over-1000-jobs/#.U4SnL3YuK3p

Should you wish to discuss our involvement with this transaction further, please feel free to contact :-


Principal & Business Law Solicitor

U.K. Cellular Tel.  –  07788 537 187

www.EquitableLaw.com

The Private Office | 24 Bemish Road | London | SW15 1DG 

Wednesday 14 May 2014

Understanding a Buyer's Legal Protection Processes


News | Understanding a Buyer’s Legal Protection Processes



In last month’s article I explained that as part of the Pre-Sale Process, the seller will generally want to provide limited information - presented in a format which is largely intended merely to whet the appetite of a prospective purchaser. As the sales process progresses, what legal protection will the buyer endeavour to obtain?

A well advised seller, as part of the legal process involved in a sale and purchase, will generally be successful in seeking not to be legally bound by most pre-sale statements regarding the business that might have been made to the prospective buyer.

Accordingly, while there remain transactions in which effectively a buyer merely hands over its offered purchase price and ‘hopes for the best’, because a seller will generally wish to elicit an offer from the buyer of as high a price as possible for the business being sold, it is generally the case that the seller agrees to give some element of comfort to the buyer as to the full worth of the business which the buyer proposes to purchase.

Two main legal processes have evolved - with the aim of giving the buyer comfort as to the worth of the business they are buying, and thereby allowing the buyer to offer more for the business than would be the case in a situation when the buyer is required to bear an element of risk as to the worth of the business it is buying.

The desired result should be to allow the respective parties to legally agree the ‘best deal’ that can be realistically achieved between them.

The Due Diligence Process

The first of these legal processes is known as ‘due diligence’.

This process broadly involves the buyer (prior to entering into a legally binding agreement) asking the seller a range of questions in relation to the prospective business which is proposed to be bought, followed by the seller both answering those questions (as fully and accurately as it can), and the seller producing supporting documentation (and any other evidence) to support the answers given to the questions asked.

The buyer will need to carefully consider the answers given and documentation (and other evidence) produced – so as to ensure that there are no perceived issues for the buyer with the business proposed to be bought – at the price proposed to be paid.

The Warranty and Indemnity Protection Process

The subsequent (although accompanying) process is known as ‘warranty and indemnity protection’.
Warranties and indemnities are a set of contractual statements and promises in relation to the business being bought, which the buyer asks the seller to make as part of the legal agreements.

At their simplest, warranties may effectively be a statement by the seller that they have fully and
accurately answered, and provided all documentation (and any other evidence) in response to the due diligence process.

Generally a buyer will ask for warranty protection in as all-encompassing a format as possible, and the seller will seek to qualify the requested warranty protections by way of a ‘disclosure letter’ - which seeks to set out the pertinent factual position – with the result that the buyer becomes fixed with knowledge of that factual position and loses their right to potential compensation in relation to matters which are disclosed to it.

Indemnities are a slightly different mechanism, by which (generally) a seller agrees to specifically compensate a buyer (usually) against the risk of a particular valuation issue occurring (e.g. a potential liability of the business actually arising in practise).

The Aims and Effects of Due Diligence and Warranty and Indemnity Protection

For the buyer, the process of undertaking due diligence and obtaining warranty and indemnity protection, allows it to gain some comfort and protection as to the worth of the business which it is proposing to acquire.

This in turn allows it to consider paying a full price for the assets, comfortable in the knowledge that it has reduced a certain element of the risk involved in the transaction.

The interested parties should be made aware (in early course) that it is highly likely that the due diligence process and the warranty and indemnity protection process will require them to devote considerable time and effort to achieving the desired outcome of achieving a maximum purchase price (for the seller) - and appropriate comfort and protection for the buyer, as to the business that they are buying.

Because Evolution Capital's aim is to ensure that the legal process is an integral part of the overall sale process – this should have the effect of ensuring a smooth progression of these legal processes as part of the overall transaction – and thereby efficiently and economically progress the interested parties from agreement in principle upon a transaction through to completion

Occasionally these legal processes bring to light (prior to a legal agreement being reached) a situation that is an issue for the buyer (and – in many cases – that the seller was not envisaging would be an issue for the buyer).

These legal processes allow buyer and seller to discuss the relevant problematic issue prior to entering into any legal agreement, and thereby to seek to resolve the issue by a number of possible approaches which can be taken (e.g. fuller explanation of a perceived issue by the seller to the buyer removing any concerns, adjustment to the sale and purchase price and / or a contractual agreement adjusting which party bears a risk of a potential liability crystallising – i.e. an indemnity etc.). The hoped for end result is a much fairer and more reasonable ‘deal’ with the ‘right’ sale and purchase price being agreed to be paid for a ‘correctly perceived’ business.

If notwithstanding these processes, the business which is transferred is not that which was indicated as part of the due diligence process, and as such position is contractually supported by the warranties and indemnities, then the buyer will generally have a potential contractual recourse against the seller for compensation pursuant to the terms of the sale and purchase agreement.

The warranties and indemnities in such circumstances can accordingly be considered to be a means to adjust the purchase price to the ‘right’ sale and purchase price which would have been paid, if the purchaser had been able to accurately understand the situation of the business that they were acquiring.

It is so as to hopefully avoid the necessity for such ‘post deal price adjustment discussions’ that the interested parties (and their advisers) should focus upon these legal processes as an absolutely crucial part of successfully achieving the completion of the transaction.
 
http://www.evolutioncapital.com/news-articles/understanding-a-buyers-legal-protection-processes#.U3M5TnZLrkY

The Legal Sale and Purchase Processes

The Legal Sale and Purchase Processes

Those involved in owning and running businesses often find that a major transaction (including a sale and purchase of a business) is a highly stressful time for them.
At a time when they already have responsibilities for successfully trading their underlying business – they find themselves needing to engage with transactional lawyers in what appear to be highly time-consuming legal processes, and whose aims may seem unclear.

This position can be particularly annoying, because it often seems to those involved, that the legal processes are delaying the completion of the transaction - which the interested party principles believe they have already agreed upon.

Evolution Capital's aim is to ensure that the legal process involved in a transaction is an integral part of the sale and purchase process - with the aim of ensuring a smooth progression of the overall transaction - so as to efficiently and economically take the interested party principles from initial discussions through to completion.

That aim is considerably assisted if the interested party principles have an opportunity to consider and understand why the legal elements of a sale process have evolved to be as they are.

The Pre-Sale Process

It is an accepted part of the marketing of a business for sale but those involved in the process on the ‘sell side’ will want to "keep their cards as close as possible to their chest". The seller will want to provide just enough information as is required so as to whet the appetite of the prospective purchaser, while not wishing to create any legal obligations – including any possible liabilities relating to its description of the business to the prospective buyer.

Unlike the legal protections which apply in (say) sale and purchase arrangements between retailers and consumers, there is very little protection generally afforded to a buyer of business assets under English law. This position is best noted in the relatively well-known English maxim of "Caveat Emptor"- or in more colloquial English – "Buyer Beware".

A buyer is generally entitled to redress for the effects of misrepresentations which may be made by a seller to the buyer with the aim of inducing a sale. However, if a seller of business assets is aware of an actual or potential problem with their business, they are generally fully entitled to stay silent upon that issue (i.e. there is no obligation to disclose the perceived problem to the prospective buyer).

The general position in English law, is that if a buyer purchases a "pig in a poke" – Or in more formal language, a business which is ‘not all that it was thought to be by the buyer’, then any recourse against the seller is likely to be severely limited. This will be particularly so because a well advised seller, as part of the legal process involved in the sale and purchase, will generally be successful in seeking not to be legally bound by most pre-sale statements regarding the business that it might have made to the prospective buyer, often as part of the process of the seller seeking to encourage the buyer to make a generous offer for the relevant business.

If this general position in English law is not addressed, then the likely result will be that the buyer is subject to some element of risk that the business which they are proposing buying is not worth what the buyer proposes paying for it. That element of risk would then generally need to be factored into the price that the buyer proposes paying – effectively by a reduction in the purchase price that the buyer might be minded to pay for the business, if it could satisfy itself that the business was all that the buyer believed it was.

Accordingly, while there remain transactions in which effectively a buyer merely hands over the offered purchase price and ‘hopes for the best’, because the seller would generally wish to elicit an offer from the buyer of as high a price as possible for the business being sold and purchased, it is generally the case that the seller agrees to give some element of comfort to the buyer as to the full worth of the business which the buyer proposes to purchase.

Two main legal processes, Due Diligence and a Warranty (and Indemnity) Protection Process, have evolved with the aim of giving the buyer comfort as to the worth of the business they are buying – and thereby allowing the buyer to offer more for the business than in a situation when the buyer is required to bear an element of risk as to the worth of the business it is buying.

Having given a general outline to the legal sales and purchase processes in next month’s article I will detail the two main legal buyer protection processes and describe the aims and potential effects to each party.

http://www.evolutioncapital.com/news-articles/the-legal-sale-and-purchase-processes#.U3M4UXZLrkZ