Thursday 21 May 2020

Two (2) Words > The Second One Of Which Is "Off" . . . (Never Heard From Him Again)!

 

Mr. [Idiot Ex-Boyfriend] 

 

BEmail Only:  Various Email Addresses 

  

 

Date:   

 [Date] 2020 

 

 

 

 

Our Ref: 

DRJ / SA   

 

 

 

 

 

 


Dear Sir, 

 

[Successful Business] (and its Sole Director, Ms. [Impressive Businesswoman) –v- Mr. [Idiot Boyfriend] 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE SAVE AS TO COSTS   

 

We are Solicitors of the Senior Courts in England and Wales, instructed on behalf of [Successful Business] (and its Sole Director, Ms. [Impressive Businesswoman). 

 

Our client(s) instructed us earlier this year in relation to a considerable volume of historic and ongoing correspondence that you have sent over recent periods to various persons associated with our client(s), post the ending of your business involvement with [Successful Business] and your personal relationship with Ms [Impressive Businesswoman]. 

 

We have recently been sent yet further correspondence which appears to relate to deferred payments / credit purchases of mobile phones by yourself (personally) - but which you had historically managed to get [Successful Business] to meet the costs of (by deceitful ongoing deductions from that company’s bank account). 

 

Your invoice is accordingly completely inappropriate, will not be paid by [Successful Business] and should accordingly be withdrawn. 

 

The present position arising appears to be that the liability for the particular payments will now rest with the appropriate party properly liable for the relevant debt(s) – i.e. you (personally).   

 

[Successful Business] fully reserves its position in relation to all contractual debt etc. matters relating to the relevant deferred payments / credit purchases. 

 

Further, this letter is formal notification that your correspondence with any staff member of [Successful Business] (including, without limitation Ms. [Impressive Businesswoman]) is extremely unwelcome and unwanted, and you are placed upon formal written notice of that position for the purposes of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. 

 

While the contents of this dated letter (sent by timed and dated email) have not presently been brought to the attention of (the Metropolitan Police and / or) [Idiot Boyfriend’s Local Constabulary], if there is any further evidenced attempt to communicate with our client(s), then I have little doubt that our client(s) instructions will be to do so.       

 

If you feel that you have any legal claim against our client(s), we confirm we are instructed to accept service upon their behalf (although we do NOT accept service by any other means than physical or Royal Mail postal service – i.e. we do not accept service by email or any method other than as stated). 

 

We bring to your attention that the general position regarding claims brought pursuant to the U.K. Court System is that a losing party in relation to a court action is habitually ordered to meet the other side’s legal (and other) costs – which may be on an indemnity (i.e. £ Pound for £ Pound) basis in appropriate circumstances. 

   

We trust that this concludes matters, and other than as stated earlier - we will not be entering into further correspondence with you. 

 

Yours faithfully 

 

 

Founding Principal & Business Law Solicitor 

Issued for and on behalf of Equitable Law 

 

Mob.:+44 (0) 7788 537 187U.K. Cellular (& e-Telephone) 

 

 

NO (0) Annexures